How can the chief spokesman for the president of the United
States accuse Southern Baptists of perpetuating "religious
intolerance" and "ancient religious hatred" because of
their desire to share the gospel and pray for Muslims?
Joe Lockhart, presidential press secretary, did just that on Dec.
16 when responding to a question about evangelism efforts by Southern
Baptists. How is it that the disciples of so-called
"tolerance" can act intolerantly with no sense of duplicity?
Would Lockhart make such an intolerant comment about any other
religious group? No, only Christians are fair game, especially when
they can be cast as the radical right.
No wonder many religious people oppose "hate crime laws."
Lockhart’s comments reflect an obsession with "hate crime"
enforcement without regard for its potential to silence religious
expression and other speech disfavored by the political elite.
The Southern Baptists are acting in obedience to the Great
Commission. Before ascending into heaven, Christ commanded his
disciples to: "Go therefore and make disciples of all the
nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the
Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and
lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age" (Matthew
28: 18-20).
Christ commanded Christians to go out into the world - to every
person, religious and irreligious - and to share the Good News that
God loves them and offers them forgiveness of their sins and eternal
life through the death, burial and resurrection of his Son.
Jesus measures our obedience to Him by our love not only for Him,
but for others (John 14:21). It is not love but hypocrisy for
Christians to say that we love our fellow man, yet fail to share the
Good News. If we neglect to obey the Great Commission, we cannot claim
to love our neighbor as ourselves.
When Christians speak about faith in Christ, we speak because we
believe everybody needs Jesus. Christians are neither better, holier
nor worthier than anyone else. If we were truly intolerant and
exclusionary, we wouldn’t invite others to join us. Our faith doesn’t
afford us that luxury.
The desire to fulfill this God-given duty and privilege of
witnessing for Christ, drove the Pilgrims to come to this country - to
obey their Master without fear of being persecuted by government.
So important was religious freedom that it became the first liberty
protected in the Bill of Rights. Yet Lockhart’s outrageous smear
exemplifies concerns that belief-based crimes will eventually be used
to silence disfavored speech and groups.
The federal hate-crime statute (U.S.C. Section 245), includes
"intimidate" or "attempt to intimidate" as an
element of the offense. Because speech can intimidate, it is not
unreasonable to foresee prosecution of a Christian for quoting the
words of Christ, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no
one comes to the father, but through me."
If an unbeliever feels intimidated as a result and files a
complaint, the Christian could easily find himself on the wrong end of
a federal felony prosecution.
But as Solomon said, "There is nothing new under the
sun." It wouldn’t be the first time a politician incited public
hatred of Christians by false accusation.
Nero said Christians were guilty of "hatred of mankind."
After being rebuked for his insulting remarks, Lockhart has tried to
assuage them by expressing his regrets. Are we to believe that he,
like Nero, was just fiddling around?
Source: Washington Watch, March 2000, Family Research Council (www.frc.org)
|